Curriculum: Operads, Hochschild Cohomology, Deformation Theory, and Witt Vectors

Prerequisites for the categorical entropy research thread. See Categorical Entropy, Entropy as an Operad Derivation, and Thermodynamic Semirings.


Operads: Definitions and Examples

  • Symmetric sequences: collections \(\{\mathcal{O}(n)\}_{n \geq 0}\) with \(S_n\)-actions; the composition product \(\mathcal{O} \circ \mathcal{P}\) of two symmetric sequences; the monoidal category \((\mathbf{SymSeq}, \circ, \mathbf{1})\)
  • Definition of an operad as a monoid in \((\mathbf{SymSeq}, \circ)\): unit \(\eta: \mathbf{1} \to \mathcal{O}\) and associative composition \(\gamma: \mathcal{O} \circ \mathcal{O} \to \mathcal{O}\); equivalent definition via partial compositions \(\circ_i\) and the associativity, unit, equivariance axioms
  • Morphisms of operads; the category \(\mathbf{Op}\); operads as a full subcategory of monoids in \(\mathbf{SymSeq}\)
  • Key examples: \(\mathrm{Ass}\) (all permutations, encodes associative algebras); \(\mathrm{Com}\) (one operation per arity, encodes commutative algebras); \(\mathrm{Lie}\) (antisymmetric bracket); \(\mathrm{End}_V = \{\mathrm{Hom}(V^{\otimes n}, V)\}\) (the endomorphism operad of a vector space)
  • The maps \(\mathrm{Lie} \to \mathrm{Ass} \to \mathrm{Com}\) as operad morphisms; what they say about the categories of algebras
  • Topological operads: operads in \(\mathbf{Top}\) with continuous structure maps; the little disks operad \(\mathcal{D}_n\) and its recognition principle for \(n\)-fold loop spaces
  • The probability operad \(\mathcal{P}\): \(\mathcal{P}(n) = \Delta^{n-1}\) as a topological operad; operadic composition as distribution mixing; entropy as an internal \(\mathcal{P}\)-algebra; why \(\mathcal{P}\) is not an algebraic operad (non-discrete arities)
  • Colored operads and multicategories: operads with multiple types; small categories as colored operads with only unary operations; symmetric monoidal categories as colored operads

References: Loday & Vallette, Algebraic Operads Ch. 1–5; Markl, Operads and PROPs; Leinster, Entropy and Diversity Ch. 2–3


Operads: Algebras and Modules

  • Algebras over an operad: a vector space \(A\) with structure maps \(\gamma_A: \mathcal{O}(n) \otimes A^{\otimes n} \to A\) compatible with \(\gamma\); the category \(\mathcal{O}\text{-}\mathbf{Alg}\); recovering associative, commutative, Lie algebras from \(\mathrm{Ass}\), \(\mathrm{Com}\), \(\mathrm{Lie}\)
  • Free \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebras \(\mathcal{O}(V) = \bigoplus_{n \geq 0} \mathcal{O}(n) \otimes_{S_n} V^{\otimes n}\); the free-forgetful adjunction \(\mathcal{O}(-) \dashv U\)
  • Left \(\mathcal{O}\)-modules, right \(\mathcal{O}\)-modules, \((\mathcal{O}, \mathcal{O})\)-bimodules; structure maps and compatibility with operadic composition; the category \({}^\mathcal{O}\mathbf{Mod}^\mathcal{O}\)
  • The enveloping algebra \(U_\mathcal{O}(A)\) of an \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebra \(A\): the universal associative algebra such that \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, M) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_{U_\mathcal{O}(A)}(U_\mathcal{O}(A), M)\); explicit construction as a quotient of the tensor algebra on \(\mathcal{O}\)
  • Derivations of \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebras: \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, M)\) for an \(A\)-module \(M\); inner derivations; the evaluation map \(\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{O}, -) \to \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, -)\) from operad derivations to algebra derivations
  • Kähler differentials \(\Omega^1_\mathcal{O}(A)\): the universal \(A\)-module representing \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, -)\); construction as \(U_\mathcal{O}(A) \otimes_A \Omega^1 / \text{(relations)}\); the operadic cotangent sequence
  • \(A_\infty\)-algebras: algebras over the \(A_\infty\) operad; structure maps \(m_n: A^{\otimes n} \to A[2-n]\) satisfying the Stasheff relations \(\sum_{i+j=n+1} \sum_k (-1)^\star m_i(\ldots, m_j(\ldots), \ldots) = 0\); \(A_\infty\) as a minimal resolution of \(\mathrm{Ass}\)
  • The probability operad revisited: the \(\mathcal{P}\)-algebra structure on \(\mathbb{R}\) via weighted averages; entropy as a derivation of this algebra; the BFL twisted-composition rule as \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\)

References: Loday & Vallette, Algebraic Operads Ch. 5–6; Fresse, Modules over Operads and Functors Ch. 2–5; Voronov, The \(A_\infty\) operad and \(A_\infty\) algebras


Operads: Koszul Duality and the Bar Construction

  • The operadic bar construction \(B(\mathcal{O})\): a dg-cooperad with underlying symmetric sequence \(\mathcal{O}^{\circ+}\); the differential encoding operadic composition; \(B(\mathcal{O})\) as the “derived” version of \(\mathcal{O}\)
  • The cobar construction \(\Omega(\mathcal{C})\) for a dg-cooperad \(\mathcal{C}\): a dg-operad; the bar-cobar adjunction \(\Omega \dashv B\); the counit \(\Omega B(\mathcal{O}) \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathcal{O}\) as a cofibrant resolution
  • The twisting morphism \(\alpha: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{O}\) between a cooperad and an operad; the twisted composite product \(\mathcal{C} \circ_\alpha \mathcal{O}\); the Maurer-Cartan equation for twisting morphisms
  • Koszul duality for operads: the Koszul dual cooperad \(\mathcal{O}^¡\) of a quadratic operad \(\mathcal{O}\); the canonical twisting morphism \(\kappa: \mathcal{O}^¡ \to \mathcal{O}\); a quadratic operad is Koszul iff \(\kappa\) is a quasi-isomorphism
  • The Koszul criterion: \(\mathcal{O}\) is Koszul iff the bar construction \(B(\mathcal{O})\) has homology concentrated in arity $= $ weight; examples \(\mathrm{Ass}^! = \mathrm{Ass}\), \(\mathrm{Com}^! = \mathrm{Lie}\), \(\mathrm{Lie}^! = \mathrm{Com}\) (Koszul self-duality and the Lie-Com duality)
  • \(\mathcal{O}_\infty\)-algebras from Koszul duality: for a Koszul operad \(\mathcal{O}\), the \(\infty\)-version \(\mathcal{O}_\infty = \Omega(\mathcal{O}^¡)\) gives the correct homotopy-coherent notion; \(A_\infty = \Omega(\mathrm{Ass}^¡)\), \(L_\infty = \Omega(\mathrm{Com}^¡)\)
  • Operadic cohomology via the bar construction: \(H^\bullet_\mathcal{O}(A, M)\) computed by the complex \(\mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}\text{-bimod}}(B(\mathcal{O}, A, A), M)\); the two-sided bar resolution \(B(\mathcal{O}, A, A)\) as a free resolution of \(A\) as an \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebra
  • The deformation complex of an operad: \(\mathrm{Def}(\mathcal{O}) = \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathbf{SymSeq}}(\mathcal{O}^¡, \mathcal{O})\) with the convolution \(L_\infty\)-algebra structure; Maurer-Cartan elements as deformed operad structures; \(H^0(\mathrm{Def}(\mathcal{O}))\) as infinitesimal automorphisms, \(H^1\) as infinitesimal deformations

References: Loday & Vallette, Algebraic Operads Ch. 6–7, 10–12; Ginzburg & Kapranov, Koszul duality for operads (Duke Math. J. 1994)


Hochschild Cohomology

  • The Hochschild cochain complex \(C^n(A, M) = \mathrm{Hom}(A^{\otimes n}, M)\) for an associative \(k\)-algebra \(A\) and \(A\)-bimodule \(M\); the coboundary \(\delta: C^n \to C^{n+1}\) via the explicit formula \(((\delta f)(a_0, \ldots, a_n) = a_0 f(a_1, \ldots) + \sum_i (-1)^i f(\ldots, a_i a_{i+1}, \ldots) + (-1)^{n+1} f(\ldots, a_{n-1}) a_n)\)
  • \(HH^0(A, M)\) as the center \(Z(A, M) = \{m \in M : am = ma\}\); \(HH^0(A, A) = Z(A)\)
  • \(HH^1(A, M) = \mathrm{Der}(A, M) / \mathrm{InnDer}(A, M)\): derivations modulo inner derivations; proof that 1-cocycles are exactly derivations
  • \(HH^2(A, M)\) classifies infinitesimal deformations of \(A\) over \(k[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2\): the obstruction to extending a deformation from order \(n\) to order \(n+1\) lives in \(HH^3\)
  • The cup product \(\smile: HH^p \otimes HH^q \to HH^{p+q}\); the Gerstenhaber bracket \([-,-]: HH^p \otimes HH^q \to HH^{p+q-1}\); the resulting \(G_\infty\) (Gerstenhaber) algebra structure on \(HH^\bullet(A, A)\)
  • Cyclic cohomology \(HC^\bullet(A)\): the cyclic cochain complex; the SBI long exact sequence \(\cdots \to HC^{n-1} \xrightarrow{S} HC^{n+1} \xrightarrow{B} HH^n \xrightarrow{I} HC^n \to \cdots\); Connes’ \(B\)-operator
  • Operadic cohomology \(H^\bullet_\mathcal{O}(A, M)\): the general construction for any operad \(\mathcal{O}\); Hochschild as the \(\mathrm{Ass}\) case; Harrison cohomology as the \(\mathrm{Com}\) case; Chevalley-Eilenberg as the \(\mathrm{Lie}\) case
  • André-Quillen cohomology \(AQ^\bullet(A, M)\) for commutative algebras: the derived functor of derivations; relation to Harrison via the Harrison-André-Quillen comparison
  • Kähler differentials \(\Omega^1_{A/k}\): the \(A\)-module generated by symbols \(da\) with \(d(ab) = a\,db + b\,da\); the universal property \(\mathrm{Der}_k(A, M) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_A(\Omega^1_{A/k}, M)\); the cotangent sequence \(\Omega^1_{B/k} \otimes_B A \to \Omega^1_{A/k} \to \Omega^1_{A/B} \to 0\)
  • The cotangent complex \(\mathbb{L}_{A/k}\): the derived version of \(\Omega^1\); André-Quillen cohomology as \(\mathrm{Ext}^\bullet(\mathbb{L}_{A/k}, M)\); the cotangent complex for operadic algebras

References: Weibel, Introduction to Homological Algebra Ch. 9; Witherspoon, Hochschild Cohomology for Algebras Ch. 1–4; Loday, Cyclic Homology Ch. 1–2; Ginzburg, Lectures on Noncommutative Geometry


Deformation Theory

  • Formal deformations of a \(k\)-algebra \(A\): a flat \(k[t](/notes/t/)\)-algebra \(A_t\) with \(A_t / tA_t \cong A\); the first-order deformation \(\mu_1 \in C^2(A, A)\) satisfying the Maurer-Cartan equation \(\delta\mu_1 + \frac{1}{2}[\mu_1, \mu_1] = 0\) in \(HH^\bullet\)
  • The Maurer-Cartan equation in a dg-Lie algebra \((\mathfrak{g}, d, [-,-])\): \(d\gamma + \frac{1}{2}[\gamma, \gamma] = 0\); gauge equivalence; the Deligne groupoid \(\mathrm{MC}(\mathfrak{g})\) as the moduli of deformations
  • \(L_\infty\)-algebras: the homotopy-coherent generalization of dg-Lie algebras; higher brackets \(\ell_n: \mathfrak{g}^{\otimes n} \to \mathfrak{g}[2-n]\); the \(L_\infty\) Maurer-Cartan equation \(\sum_{n \geq 1} \frac{1}{n!} \ell_n(\gamma^{\otimes n}) = 0\)
  • Rigidity: \(HH^2(A, A) = 0\) implies \(A\) is rigid (no nontrivial formal deformations); examples of rigid algebras
  • Formality of a dg-algebra: quasi-isomorphic to its cohomology \(H^\bullet(A)\); a formal dg-algebra has no higher Massey products; Kontsevich’s formality theorem for \(C^\infty(M)\) as a dg-Lie algebra
  • Deformation quantization: deforming a commutative Poisson algebra \((A, \{-,-\})\) to a noncommutative \(\star\)-product \(f \star g = fg + \hbar\{f,g\}/2 + O(\hbar^2)\); Kontsevich’s theorem that every Poisson manifold admits a canonical deformation quantization
  • Deformations of operads: the deformation complex \(\mathrm{Def}(\mathcal{O})\) of an operad; the \(L_\infty\)-algebra structure on \(\mathrm{Def}(\mathcal{O})\); Maurer-Cartan elements as deformed operad structures
  • Thermodynamic semirings as deformations: the tropical semiring \((\mathbb{R}, \min, +)\) as the \(\beta \to \infty\) limit; \(\oplus_\beta\) as a formal deformation of \(\min\); Shannon entropy as the first-order coefficient \(\partial(\oplus_\beta)/\partial\beta^{-1}|_{\beta = \infty}\); the deformation complex of the tropical semiring

References: Manetti, Deformation Theory via Differential Graded Lie Algebras; Kontsevich & Soibelman, Deformation Theory (lecture notes); Loday & Vallette, Algebraic Operads Ch. 12–13; Kontsevich, Deformation Quantization of Poisson Manifolds


Witt Vectors

  • Motivation: the problem of lifting a ring \(R\) of characteristic \(p\) to characteristic \(0\); the non-canonicity of naive lifts; Witt vectors as the canonical solution
  • Ghost components: a Witt vector \((a_0, a_1, a_2, \ldots) \in W(R)\) corresponds to ghost coordinates \(w_n = \sum_{d \mid n} d\, a_d^{n/d}\); ring operations defined by requiring ghost maps to be ring homomorphisms \(W(R) \to R^\mathbb{N}\)
  • \(p\)-typical Witt vectors \(W(R)\): restricting to \(p\)-power ghost components \(w_{p^n}\); the truncated Witt vectors \(W_n(R)\); \(W(\mathbb{F}_p) \cong \mathbb{Z}_p\)
  • Frobenius \(F: W(R) \to W(R)\) shifting ghost coordinates by \(F(w_n) = w_{pn}\); Verschiebung \(V: W(R) \to W(R)\) with \(V(w_n) = pw_{n/p}\) (zero if \(p \nmid n\)); the fundamental relations \(FV = p\), \(VF = \mathrm{mult. by } p\), \(FV = VF\) on ghosts
  • Big Witt vectors \(\mathbb{W}(R)\): using all ghost components \(w_n\) for \(n \geq 1\); the \(\lambda\)-ring structure on \(\mathbb{W}(R)\); Adams operations \(\psi^n\)
  • The functor \(W: \mathbf{CRing} \to \mathbf{CRing}\); right adjoint to the forgetful functor from \(\delta\)-rings; Witt vectors as the representing object for \(p\)-typical \(\lambda\)-ring structures
  • \(\delta\)-rings: a ring \(R\) with a map \(\delta: R \to R\) satisfying \(\delta(x+y) = \delta(x) + \delta(y) + \frac{x^p + y^p - (x+y)^p}{p}\) and \(\delta(xy) = x^p\delta(y) + y^p\delta(x) + p\delta(x)\delta(y)\); the connection to Frobenius lifts \(\phi(x) = x^p + p\delta(x)\); \(\delta\)-rings as the correct algebraic framework for \(p\)-adic Hodge theory
  • Thermodynamic Witt vectors: the \(\oplus_\beta\) family as a temperature-parametrized deformation of \((\mathbb{R}, \min)\); Boltzmann weights \(e^{-\beta E_i}\) as the analogue of Teichmüller representatives; entropy as the \(\delta\)-ring derivation \(\partial/\partial\beta\) at \(\beta = \infty\)
  • Witt vectors and \(p\)-adic Hodge theory: \(A_\mathrm{inf} = W(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{C}_p}^\flat)\) as the period ring; the Fontaine map; connection to prismatic cohomology (Bhatt-Scholze)

References: Rabinoff, The Theory of Witt Vectors; Hazewinkel, Witt Vectors; Borger, The Basic Geometry of Witt Vectors, I; Joyal, \(\delta\)-anneaux et vecteurs de Witt


Relating the Two Operadic Definitions of Entropy

Why operadic cohomology appears here

The core logical path — showing that Bradley’s operad derivation \(D \in \mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{P}, M)\) and the BFL algebra derivation \(d \in \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\) are related — only requires the evaluation map \(\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{P}, -) \to \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}, -)\), which follows from the universal property of the enveloping algebra and the Kähler differentials comparison map. The bar construction and \(H^\bullet_\mathcal{P}\) are not needed just to construct this map. They appear here because they are needed for the stronger question: are the two conditions equivalent, and if not, what is the obstruction? The bar resolution computes those obstructions, and the tangent/cotangent complex framing is what lets you interpret entropy as a cohomology class unifying both definitions. Skip to Kähler differentials + the comparison map if you only want the existence of the map.

The BFL internal \(\mathcal{P}\)-algebra condition and the Bradley operad derivation condition are derivations of different objects — an algebra over \(\mathcal{P}\) vs. the operad \(\mathcal{P}\) itself. The following topics are needed to understand how they relate.

  • Modules over operads: left \(\mathcal{O}\)-modules \(M\) with structure maps \(\mathcal{O}(n) \otimes_{\mathcal{O}} M \to M\); bimodules; the category \(_\mathcal{O}\mathbf{Mod}_\mathcal{O}\); examples for \(\mathrm{Ass}\) recovering the classical notion of bimodule
  • The enveloping algebra \(U_\mathcal{O}(A)\): for an \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebra \(A\), the universal associative algebra such that \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, M) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_{U_\mathcal{O}(A)}(U_\mathcal{O}(A), M)\); the natural evaluation map \(\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{O}, -) \to \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, -)\) sending an operad derivation to an induced algebra derivation on every \(\mathcal{O}\)-algebra \(A\)
  • Operadic Kähler differentials: the universal \(A\)-module \(\Omega^1_\mathcal{O}(A)\) with \(\mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, M) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_A(\Omega^1_\mathcal{O}(A), M)\); the universal operad bimodule \(\Omega^1(\mathcal{O})\) with \(\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{O}, M) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}\text{-bimod}}(\Omega^1(\mathcal{O}), M)\); the comparison map \(\Omega^1(\mathcal{O}) \otimes_\mathcal{O} A \to \Omega^1_\mathcal{O}(A)\) and when it is an isomorphism
  • The bar construction and operadic cohomology: \(B(\mathcal{O}, A, A)\) as the two-sided bar resolution computing \(H^\bullet_\mathcal{O}(A, M)\); the bar construction \(B(\mathcal{O})\) for the operad itself computing \(H^\bullet_\mathrm{op}(\mathcal{O}, M)\); the map between the two complexes induced by evaluation
  • The explicit calculation for \(\mathcal{P}\): the evaluation map \(\mathrm{Der}(\mathcal{P}, M) \to \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}, N)\) for Bradley’s bimodule \(M = C(\mathbb{R}^-, \mathbb{R})\) and the BFL bimodule \(N = \mathbb{R}\); whether the Leibniz condition on \(d\) maps to the twisted-composition condition on \(\alpha\) under this map
  • The operadic tangent and cotangent complex: \(\mathbb{T}_\mathcal{O}(A) = \mathrm{Der}_\mathcal{O}(A, A)\) and \(\mathbb{L}_\mathcal{O}(A) = \Omega^1_\mathcal{O}(A)\) as the cotangent complex; entropy as a class in \(H^1(\mathbb{T}_\mathcal{O}(\mathcal{P}))\) unifying both derivation notions

References: Fresse, Modules over Operads and Functors (Springer LNM 1967) Ch. 4–5; Loday & Vallette, Algebraic Operads Ch. 6–7, 12; Hinich, Homological algebra of homotopy algebras; Bradley, arXiv:2107.09581 §3–4